Email a colleague    

September 2010

Telecom Software: Should I Buy or Should I Build?

Telecom Software: Should I Buy or Should I Build?

Full disclosure — my company, Equinox Information Systems, sells and customizes commercial-off-the-shelf software, so don’t be surprised that I’m going to make a case for buying most of the time.

But, there are situations where building really does make the most sense.  My goal in this blog and my next one is to outline the advantages and the challenges of both scenarios.

The Case for Building Your Own

Typically the decision to build a solution in-house makes the most sense at the low end and high end of the project spectrum.  If a project has a limited set of well-defined and static requirements, AND development resources are readily available, it’s hard to argue against building it yourself.  You can utilize sunk-cost resources and likely get a quicker turnaround.  Once the project is done, the development staff can move on to the next project, as maintenance and enhancement work is not likely to be needed.

Likewise at the high end, large-scale projects sometimes reach a point where building makes the most sense, such as Tier 1 carriers processing billions of CDRs a day.  Any vendor-supported solution at that volume would likely include a large up-front charge, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual maintenance costs.  For that money the carrier can justify a dedicated IT staff of three or four people to do ongoing development and maintenance of the application.

So, at the low end, where ongoing development resources are not required, or at the high end where dedicated IT resources are cost justified, building may make sense.  But I hasten to add a couple of cautions.  In either case, the key is having dedicated IT resources for the duration of the engagement.  And, to build in-house, you need enough internal subject matter expertise and insight into what’s going on in the industry.  Only with that knowledge can you direct the development staff, saying, “We need to add X, Y, and Z capabilities to the application to keep up with what the industry is doing.“

In-House Projects: the Illusion of Control

The most common argument in favor of building in-house is control. “If I build my own system, I can not only control the cost, but also features and functions, timing, and integration with other systems.  And I can also do strategic differentiation.  If there’s something very unique to my value chain, I can build that into my solution and other carriers will not benefit from it, which might happen if I use a vendor who adds it to their commercial release.“

In theory, by building yourself, you’ll have total control over these things, making you master of your destiny.  But as Albert Einstein famously said, “In theory, theory and practice are the same.  In practice, they are not.“

As I said above, the key is having dedicated IT resources for the duration of the engagement.  In my experience, I’ve never run across a carrier with a group of developers sitting in a back room twiddling their thumbs.  When you start digging into how feasible it really is to build yourself, you find that, yes, there are developers on staff, but they are busy working on many other projects.

Getting your hands on those precious IT resources is quite a challenge.  Somebody has to first champion the project and convince management to allocate those IT resources in the first place.  Then, they need to insist that once the project kicks off, developers aren’t going to be pulled off to do some new strategic project — they are going to keep working on it till it’s done.  And remember, unless the project is small and the requirements finite, you are going to need those resources not just for the initial development, but also for ongoing enhancement and support.

So what happens in the real world?  Often, if you’re lucky, IT will build it for you.  But once it’s built, the chances of getting a follow-up project prioritized high enough to get timely modifications done are very, very low.

Even if you do succeed in getting resources allocated for follow-up work, you might end up having to reinvent the wheel.  In the initial development stage, a couple of programmers write the code, and that’s great because these guys really understand the project.  But because the IT staff is fairly fluid, when it comes time for changes, those key staff members are gone or are not available, which means there are no IT folks around or available that really understand the project.

If you are seriously considering building in-house, first ask yourself one-simple question: “How responsive was IT when I last had an urgent need?“ When I ask customers that question, I usually hear something like, “They were so slammed at the time that it took forever.”  If your answer is along those lines, then you have to wonder about how much control building a solution really gives you.

Can Your In-House Application Stay State-of-the-Art?

One of the key selling points for our Protector Fraud Management Solution is that the product doesn’t stand still.  As the industry and threats evolve, Protector evolves.  We not only build into it the capabilities we know it needs, but in addition, we incorporate almost every feature our customers for the last 20 years have told us they needed.

Fraudsters can beat you in a lot of different ways and their techniques continue to evolve.  So if you’ve built a static in-house system that addresses yesterday’s fraud problem, but you’ve not made the enhancements to address tomorrow’s fraud problem, you’re highly vulnerable to attack.

This is why, to stay on top of fraud trends, like most vendors, we constantly talk to our large community of users, adding features and functions based on their feedback.

When one customer tells us about a new kind of fraud they are seeing, we update our Protector product right away to protect them.  Later if another client of ours experiences a similar attack, they’re protected.

The revenue assurance software field is just as dynamic as fraud.  Five years ago, the hot issue was phantom traffic.  Two years ago traffic pumping was what everybody talked about.  Today, as margins get tighter, carriers using wholesale providers want to validate their invoices.  As each new trend surfaced, we grew our product accordingly.

In fact, when we first designed our TeleLink application years ago, it was primarily just a reporting tool, but our customers are using it in entirely different ways now.  Companies that invested in that product early on are getting the benefit of a product that’s matured into something more valuable than it was before.

And remember, vendors like Equinox don’t operate in a vacuum.  We live in a dynamic commercial market that forces us to stay on our toes and offer better features and keep our costs competitive.  In the open market, products get better, and benefits get cheaper — you don’t get that same “pressure-to-improve“ with an internally developed solution.

Conclusion

At the outset, I highlighted two areas where I think building your own solution makes a lot of sense — a very large-scale application and a small, self-contained one.

But beyond those isolated cases, we discovered that the theoretical benefits of building in house — controlling features, functions, timing, and costs — may not play out in practice.  We also discovered that keeping an application up-to-date in a fast moving marketplace is difficult if not impossible with an internally built solution.

One final thought.  A few years ago I did some research and found some interesting statistics about in-house development projects.  It turns out that:

  • Seventy-five percent are delivered behind schedule.
  • Fifty percent end up over-budgeted by more than 50 percent.
  • Thirty percent of them fail to deliver the initially promised functionality.

So, to Einstein’s point, in practice, theory and practice are never the same.  The assumption that an in-house project will be done on schedule, on budget, and with required functionality is a bad assumption to make.  More often than not, buying off the shelf is a better route to a successful project.

This article first appeared in Billing and OSS World.

Copyright 2010 Black Swan Telecom Journal

 
David West

David West

David West is executive vice president of Equinox Information Systems, responsible for developing and implementing the company’s long-term strategic plan, including product design and marketing.

Equinox Information Systems is one of the leading fraud and RA software vendors in the U.S.   Contact David via

Black Swan Solution Guides & Papers

cSwans of a Feather

  • High Touch Networking meets High Tech Partnering:  How to Leverage a Software User Conference by Dan Baker — Because a user conference is highly targeted at customers and prospects, it’s one of the most cost effective and personal ways for a software vendor to spread positive industry buzz and pave the way for sales.
  • Telecom Software: Should I Buy or Should I Build? by David West — Build custom systems in-house vs. buying commercial software is a critical issue for service providers.  This article make a strong case for why commercial software is best in most situations.  Discussion points include: cost tradeoffs, the illusion of in-house control, and staying current in a dynamic market like fraud assurance.

Related Articles

  • Tokopedia, Indonesia’s E-Commerce King, Partners with 11 Million Merchants; Adopts Multi-Cloud to Drive Innovation interview with Warren Aw & Ryan de Melo — Indonesia’s Tokopedia, founded in 2009, has grown to become one of world’s leading e-commerce players.  Read about its success, technology direction, and multi-cloud connectivity adoption.
  • Bridge Alliance: Knocking Down Regional & Mobile Connectivity Barriers so Connected Car Markets Get Rolling in Asia interview with Kwee Kchwee — The CEO of an Asian consortium of mobile operators explains how they  help simplify and harmonize their members‘ operations in support of multi-national corporations.  This integration is enabling two huge industries to come together in Asia: auto manufacturing and telco.
  • Epsilon’s Infiny NaaS Platform Brings Global Connection, Agility & Fast Provision for IoT, Clouds & Enterprises in Southeast Asia, China & Beyond interview with Warren Aw — Network as a Service, powered by Software Defined Networks, are a faster, more agile, and more partner-friendly way of making data global connections.  A leading NaaS provider explains the benefits for cloud apps, enterprise IT, and IoT.
  • PCCW Global: On Leveraging Global IoT Connectivity to Create Mission Critical Use Cases for Enterprises interview with Craig Price — A leading wholesale executive explains the business challenges of the current global IoT scene as it spans many spheres: technical, political, marketing, and enterprise customer value creation.
  • Senet’s Cloud & Shared Gateways Drive LoRaWAN IoT Adoption for Enterprise Businesses, Smart Cities & Telecoms interview with Bruce Chatterley — An IoT netowork pioneer explains how LoRaWAN tech fits in the larger IoT ecosystem.  He gives use case examples, describes deployment restraints/costs, and shows how partnering, gateway sharing, and flexible deployment options are stimulating growth.
  • ARM Data Center Software’s Cloud-Based Network Inventory Links Network, Operations, Billing, Sales & CRM to One Database interview with Joe McDermott & Frank McDermott — A firm offering a cloud-based network inventory system explains the virtues of: a single underlying database, flexible conversions, task-checking workflow, new software business models, views that identify stranded assets, and connecting to Microsoft’s cloud platform.
  • Pure Play NFV: Lessons Learned from Masergy’s Virtual Deployment for a Global Enterprise interview with Prayson Pate — NFV is just getting off the ground, but one cloud provider to enterprises making a stir in virtual technology waters is Masergy.  Here are lessons learned from Masergy’s recent global deployment using a NFV pure play software approach.
  • The Digital Enabler: A Charging, Self-Care & Marketing Platform at the Core of the Mobile Business interview with Jennifer Kyriakakis — The digital enabler is a central platform that ties together charging, self-care, and marketing.  The article explains why leading operators consider digital enablers pivotal to their digital strategies.
  • Delivering Service Assurance Excellence at a Reduced Operating Cost interview with Gregg Hara — The great diversity and complexity of today’s networks make service assurance a big challenge.  But advances in off-the-shelf software now permit the configuring and visualizing of services across multiple technologies on a modest operating budget.
  • Are Cloud-Based Call Centers the Next Hot Product for the SMB Market? interview with Doron Dovrat — Quality customer service can improve a company’s corporate identity and drive business growth.  But many SMBs are priced out of acquiring modern call center technology.  This article explains the benefits of affordable and flexible cloud-based call centers.
  • Flexing the OSS & Network to Support the Digital Ecosystem interview with Ken Dilbeck — The need for telecoms to support a broader digital ecosystem requires an enormous change to OSS infrastructures and the way networks are being managed.  This interview sheds light on these challenges.
  • Crossing the Rubicon: Is it Time for Tier Ones to Move to a Real-Time Analytics BSS? interview with Andy Tiller — Will tier one operators continue to maintain their quilt works of legacy and adjunct platforms — or will they radically transform their BSS architecture into a new  system designed to address the new telecom era?  An advocate for radical transformation discusses: real-time analytics, billing for enterprises, partnering mashups, and on-going transformation work at Telenor.
  • Paradigm Shift in OSS Software: Network Topology Views via Enterprise-Search interview with Benedict Enweani — Enterprise-search is a wildly successful technology on the web, yet its influence has not yet rippled to the IT main stream.  But now a large Middle Eastern operator has deployed a major service assurance application using enterprise-search.  The interview discusses this multi-dimensional topology solution and compares it to traditional network inventory.
  • The Multi-Vendor MPLS: Enabling Tier 2 and 3 Telecoms to Offer World-Class Networks to SMBs interview with Prabhu Ramachandran — MPLS is a networking technology that has caught fire in the last decade.  Yet the complexity of MPLS has relegated to being mostly a large carrier solution.  Now a developer of a multi-vendor MPLS solutions explains why the next wave of MPLS adoption will come from tier 2/3 carriers supporting SMB customers.
  • Enabling Telecoms & Utilities to Adapt to the Winds of Business Change interview with Kirill Rechter — Billing is in the midst of momentous change.  Its value is no longer just around delivering multi-play services or sophisticated rating.  In this article you’ll learn how a billing/CRM supplier has adapted to the times by offering deeper value around the larger business issues of its telecom and utility clients.
  • Driving Customer Care Results & Cost Savings from Big Data Facts interview with Brian Jurutka — Mobile broadband and today’s dizzying array of app and network technology present a big challenge to customer care.  In fact, care agents have a hard time staying one step ahead of customers who call to report problems.  But network analytics comes to the rescue with advanced mobile handset troubleshooting and an ability to put greater intelligence at the fingertips of highly trained reps.
  • Hadoop and M2M Meet Device and Network Management Systems interview with Eric Wegner — Telecom big-data in networks is more than customer experience managment: it’s also about M2M plus network and element management systems.  This interview discusses the explosion in machine-to-machine devices, the virtues and drawbacks of Hadoop, and the network impact of shrink-wrapped search.
  • The Data Center & Cloud Infrastructure Boom: Is Your Sales/Engineering Team Equipped to Win? by Dan Baker — The build-out of enterprise clouds and data centers is a golden opportunity for systems integrators, carriers, and cloud providers.  But the firms who win this business will have sales and engineering teams who can drive an effective and streamlined requirements-to-design-to-order process.  This white paper points to a solution — a collaborative solution designs system — and explains 8 key capabilities of an ideal platform.
  • Big Data: Is it Ready for Prime Time in Customer Experience Management? interview with Thomas Sutter — Customer experience management is one of the most challenging of OSS domains and some suppliers are touting “big data” solutions as the silver bullet for CEM upgrades and consolidation.  This interview challenges the readiness of big data soluions to tackle OSS issues and deliver the cost savings.  The article also provides advice on managing technology risks, software vendor partnering, and the strategies of different OSS suppliers.
  • Calculated Risk: The Race to Deliver the Next Generation of LTE Service Management interview with Edoardo Rizzi — LTE and the emerging heterogeneous networks are likely to shake up the service management and customer experience management worlds.  Learn about the many new network management challenges LTE presents, and how a small OSS software firm aims to beat the big established players to market with a bold new technology and strategy.
  • Decom Dilemma: Why Tearing Down Networks is Often Harder than Deploying Them interview with Dan Hays — For every new 4G LTE and IP-based infrastructure deployed, there typically a legacy network that’s been rendered obsolete and needs to be decommissioned.  This article takes you through the many complexities of network decom, such as facilities planning, site lease terminations, green-safe equipment disposal, and tax relief programs.
  • Migration Success or Migraine Headache: Why Upfront Planning is Key to Network Decom interview with Ron Angner — Shutting down old networks and migrating customers to new ones is among the most challenging activities a network operators does today.  This article provides advice on the many network issues surrounding migration and decommissioning.  Topics discussed include inventory reconciliation, LEC/CLEC coordination, and protection of customers in the midst of projects that require great program management skills.
  • Navigating the Telecom Solutions Wilderness: Advice from Some Veteran Mountaineers interview with Al Brisard — Telecom solutions vendors struggle mightily to position their solutions and figure out what to offer next in a market where there’s considerable product and service crossover.  In this article, a veteran order management specialist firm lays out its strategy for mixing deep-bench functional expertise with process consulting, analytics, and custom API development.
  • Will Telecoms Sink Under the Weight of their Bloated and Out-of-Control Product Stacks? interview with Simon Muderack — Telecoms pay daily for their lack of product integration as they constantly reinvent product wheels, lose customer intelligence, and waste time/money.  This article makes the case of an enterprise product catalog.  Drawing on central catalog cases at a few Tier 1 operators, the article explains the benefits: reducing billing and provisioning costs, promoting product reuse, and smoothing operations.
  • Virtual Operator Life: Enabling Multi-Level Resellers Through an Active Product Catalog interview with Rob Hill — The value of product distribution via virtual operators is immense.  They enable a carrier to sell to markets it cannot profitably serve directly.  Yet the need for greater reseller flexibility in the bundling and pricing of increasingly complex IP and cloud services is now a major channel barrier.  This article explains what’s behind an innovative product catalog solution that doubles as a service creation environment for resellers in multiple tiers.
  • Telecom Blocking & Tackling: Executing the Fundamentals of the Order-to-Bill Process interview with Ron Angner — Just as football teams need to be good at the basics of blocking and tackling, telecoms need to excel at their own fundamental skillset: the order-to-cash process.  In this article, a leading consulting firm explains its methodology for taking operators on the path towards order-to-cash excellence.  Issues discussed include: provisioning intervals; standardization and simplicity; the transition from legacy to improved process; and the major role that industry metrics play.
  • Wireline Act IV, Scene II: Packaging Network & SaaS Services Together to Serve SMBs by John Frame — As revenue from telephony services has steadily declined, fixed network operators have scrambled to support VoIP, enhanced IP services, and now cloud applications.  This shift has also brought challenges to the provisioning software vendors who support the operators.  In this interview, a leading supplier explains how it’s transforming from plain ol‘ OSS software provider to packager of on-net and SaaS solutions from an array of third party cloud providers.
  • Telecom Merger Juggling Act: How to Convert the Back Office and Keep Customers and Investors Happy at the Same Time interview with Curtis Mills — Billing and OSS conversions as the result of a merger are a risky activity as evidenced by famous cases at Fairpoint and Hawaiian Telcom.  This article offers advice on how to head off problems by monitoring key operations checkpoints, asking the right questions, and leading with a proven conversion methodology.
  • Is Order Management a Provisioning System or Your Best Salesperson? by John Konczal — Order management as a differentiator is a very new concept to many CSP people, but it’s become a very real sales booster in many industries.  Using electronics retailer BestBuy as an example, the article points to several innovations that can — and are — being applied by CSPs today.  The article concludes with 8 key questions an operator should ask to measure advanced order management progress.
  • NEC Takes the Telecom Cloud from PowerPoint to Live Customers interview with Shinya Kukita — In the cloud computing world, it’s a long road from technology success to telecom busness opportunity.  But this story about how NEC and Telefonica are partnering to offer cloud services to small and medium enterprises shows the experience of early cloud adoption.  Issues discussed in the article include: customer types, cloud application varieties, geographic region acceptance, and selling challenges.
  • Billing As Enabler for the Next Killer Business Model interview with Scott Swartz — Facebook, cloud services, and Google Ads are examples of innovative business models that demand unique or non-standard billing techniques.  The article shows how flexible, change-on-the-fly, and metadata-driven billing architectures are enabling CSPs to offer truly ground breaking services.
  • Real-Time Provisioning of SIM Cards: A Boon to GSM Operators interview with Simo Isomaki — Software-controlled SIM card configuration is revolutionizing the activation of GSM phones.  The article explains how dynamic SIM management decouples the selection of numbers/services and delivers new opportunities to market during the customer acquisition and intial provisoining phase.
  • A Cynic Converted: IN/Prepaid Platforms Are Now Pretty Cool interview with Grant Lenahan — Service delivery platforms born in the IN era are often painted as inflexible and expensive to maintain.  Learn how modern SDPs with protocol mediation, high availability, and flexible Service Creation Environments are delivering value for operators such as Brazil’s Oi.
  • Achieving Revenue Maximization in the Telecom Contact Center interview with Robert Lamb — Optimizing the contact center offers one of the greatest returns on investment for a CSP.  The director of AT&T’s contact center services business explains how telecoms can strike an “artful balance” between contact center investment and cost savings.  The discussion draws from AT&T’s consulting with world class customers like Ford, Dell, Discover Financial, DISH Network, and General Motors.
  • Mobile Broadband: The Customer Service Assurance Challenge interview with Michele Campriani — iPhone and Android traffic is surging but operators struggle with network congestion and dropping ARPUs.  The answer?  Direct  resources and service quality measures to ensure VIPs are indeed getting the quality they expect.  Using real-life examples that cut to the chase of technical complexities, this article explains the chief causes of service quality degradation and describes efficient ways to deal with the problem.
  • Telco-in-a-Box: Are Telecoms Back in the B/OSS Business? interview with Jim Dunlap — Most telecoms have long since folded their merchant B/OSS software/services businesses.  But now Cycle30, a subsidiary of Alaskan operator GCI, is offering a order-to-cash managed service for other operators and utilities.  The article discusses the company’s unique business model and contrasts it with billing service bureau and licensed software approaches.
  • Bricks, Mortar & Well-Trained Reps Make a Comeback in Customer Management interview with Scott Kohlman — Greater industry competition, service complexity, and employee turnover have raised the bar in the customer support.  Indeed, complex services are putting an emphasis on quality care interactions in the store, on the web, and through the call center.  In this article you’ll learn about innovations in CRM, multi-tabbed agent portals,  call center agent training, customer treatment philosophies, and the impact of  self-service.
  • 21st Century Order Management: The Cross-Channel Sales Conversation by John Konczal — Selling a mobile service is generally not a one-and-done transaction.  It often involves several interactions — across the web, call center, store, and even kiosks.  This article explains the power of a “cross-channel hub” which sits above all sales channels, interacts with them all, and allows a CSP to keep the sales conversation moving forward seamlessly.
  • Building a B/OSS Business Through Common Sense Customer Service by David West — Delivering customer service excellence doesn‘t require mastering some secret technique.  The premise of this article is that plain dealing with customers and employees is all that’s needed for a winning formula.  The argument is spelling out in a simple 4 step methodology along with some practical examples.